Showing posts with label english. Show all posts
Showing posts with label english. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2011

[GPC-ENGL-2] Essay 3, The Nature of Poetic Provocation in Theodore Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz”

Assignment:

The purpose of this essay is to enter the realm of academic conversation. Your claim and reasons will function as the thesis of your paper. If you identify a particular theoretical approach that supports your claim, you may want to review that material and include it in your paper. Your evidence will then be the selections of the text, as well as the scholarship of others, that you use to support your argument. Your draft should be from 1500-2000 words. Thesis statement and draft plan must be pre-approved by the instructor, but students are allowed creative flexibility with regard to approach and content on the assigned topic.

First paragraph is included here, followed by a link for the post-grademark version of the full essay.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Nature of Poetic Provocation in Theodore Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz”

On first read of any literary work, the reader will take away from it an interpretation which resonates most strongly with their life experience. Upon further readings and reflection, however, their understanding of that literary work can change. Several points play into a reader’s final interpretation of a given piece, such as the author’s intent while writing the piece, the commonality of definitions for words chosen by the author the revisions that authors habitually make along the way, and even the personal experiences of the readers, themselves. In “My Papa’s Waltz”, Theodore Roethke uses careful phrasing to provoke a diverse range of interpretations by readers of his work, relying more on his skill with this medium rather than on childhood memories to craft an emotionally evocative piece.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[GPC-ENGL-2] Essay 2, Relevant Sympathy

Assignment:

The purpose of this essay is to explicate or analyze a reading that you choose from the assigned readings in Unit Two. Write an MLA-style comparison/contrast essay of no fewer than 1000 words; no outside sources should be used in this essay; it should come entirely from your own analysis. Thesis statement and draft plan must be pre-approved by the instructor, but students are allowed creative flexibility with regard to approach and content on the assigned topic.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Like birds in a cage, there exist in our world people who understand that there is more to life than the self-imposed cage of their daily existence - invalids too ill to travel, office workers whose cubicle might as well be a second home, and factory workers whose world condenses to the square foot directly in front of them. They catch glimpses of freedom each day just outside the window, and they feel it on the breeze as the door swings shut to close them in. Their hearts beat with longing for it, echoed in the music of the world around them, and they surround themselves with visual reminders that carry all the bittersweet poignancy of a poet’s heartfelt words. Rather than relegating poems to “just a reminder of a different age”, people seek inspiration in the old words in desperate hope of escaping their personal cage. As a soulful song of lost freedoms, Dunbar’s poem “Sympathy” is a relevant reminder for today’s readers to fill every moment they can with “life fully lived and all joys fulfilled”.

In the manner of well-crafted song lyrics, Mr. Dunbar’s poem has a distinct meter and rhyming scheme that lends itself easily to spoken performance. The A-B-A-A-B-C-C pattern for each stanza draws the listener’s attention to the relationship of each spoken thought, and the cadence of each line has a distinct rhythm that leads easily from one phrase to the next, much like the gospels of his time and the Rhythm and Blues (R&B) standards of today. The words used are simple in both concept and meaning, with no word more than two syllables, so the joy of listening is not disrupted by the task of understanding. It is easy to imagine this poem set to music, with any number of popular artists today crooning it as a gentle whisper of things too important to forget or belting it out torch-style as a passionate reminder of daily joys unexpectedly lost or stolen away.

Beyond the basic structure of Mr. Dunbar’s poem, his careful wording delivers the message with powerfully evocative symbolism. He speaks first of what a caged bird must feel as it observes the world move outside its reach, of the impotent rage it must feel and, finally, why it sings such a doleful tune. In the first stanza, Mr. Dunbar invokes words of gentle movement, of life external to the cage, as relevant to the restrictions of racial oppression in his own time – or the personal restrictions of dealing with a terminal illness – as it is to the work-related “cages” of life today. People today “beat their wings” just as surely as the bird in the poem, railing against the daily-grind mindset by “taking a mental health day” or browsing the World Wide Web while on the clock, looking always for some way to distract their mind from the work-a-day prison of their own making. When the frustration of endless distraction with no true creative outlet becomes too much to bear in silence, these same people give voice to the frustration via online blogs and journals (such as the “Twitter bird” of internet fame).

Unlike the digital white noise of the internet, however, Mr. Dunbar’s poem is the very personal cry of a single voice raised with desperate hope to find a way free of the cage. Whether that voice is attributed to the Amistad mutineers as they awaited sentencing, whether that voice sings its grief alone as a newly paralyzed veteran of wars too numerous to name, or whether the drunken melancholy of middle-aged men singing about the glory days of youth, the mourning of personal freedom is an intensely personal thing. Much like the swan song of legend, the hauntingly beautiful dirge that denies being voiced until life’s end, the bird cannot trill with passionate regret for something still easily within its grasp; it requires the experience of being caged, of having its freedom stripped away forever, for the caged bird’s song to ring true for all who hear it.

“Sympathy”, then, is a most apt name for this poem, as it serves to draw the reader’s attention to the pretty bird in the gilded cage. With devout hope that the reader will sympathize with the caged bird’s plight, Dunbar’s poem exhorts his readers to see freedom as precious; he encourages them to avoid the same sorrowful entrapment that prompts the caged bird to sing. In recording this poem for posterity, Mr. Dunbar has given readers not only a concise snapshot of a single moment of his own lifetime, but a timely reminder to take time outside their own self-imposed cages and accomplish all the myriad things that bring them true peace and inner joy.

[GPC-ENGL-2] Essay 1, The Repercussions of Choice

Assignment:

Write a narrative essay of about 300 words in which you tell the story of a good choice (or a bad choice) you've made and its results in your life and the lives of others. Use a standard 12 point font and MLA style; first person narrative style is acceptable, but avoid second person. I expect this essay to demonstrate a mastery of the skills from ENGL 1101, as listed in the ENGL 1102 common course outline.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In life, we often face hard choices; in school, those choices often come in unexpected ways. When requested in the guise of a simple essay assignment, do we share our hopes, tribulations, and dreams with people who know nothing of our lives, all for sake of a grade? Do we risk opening ourselves to scrutiny of those difficult times and tough decisions, clinging to the hope that whatever grade we receive is based solely on mechanics and form, or do we surrender to the pressure for academic excellence and lay out those very personal matters in spite of the trepidation felt doing it? The trick of this particular choice is to find a point of compromise that addresses the needs of both instructor and student.

One method to make a choice easier is to attempt an objective understanding of the level of investment for each person involved. On one hand is me, the student, being required to draft an essay detailing something private and personal; on the other hand, is my instructor with a very legitimate need to evaluate my proficiency with the written word, and the essay format specifically. The assignment was to provide an essay response that details a choice made in our own lives, a topic that each student can expound upon with passion and authority. By embracing the understanding that our instructor seeks to provide “easy” subject matter, some of the outrage I felt about the topic requirements dissipated.

I am not comfortable sharing intimate details of my life with someone I have never met face-to-face, so my options for completing this assignment are to (a) bare my soul on a topic that was stressful in the first place, (b) write about the topic of personal choice from the most neutral stance possible, or (c) take an F. I cannot afford to “take the F”, and I know that my instructor does not create stress for her students purposefully, but her judgment has a direct result of success/failure on my future, and that alone triggered the flight-fight response where the topics for this essay are concerned. When instructors prove through their classroom interactions that they are worthy of basic trust, it becomes easier to admit, “This assignment is hard for me.”

Put in a position where I knew my grade rides on doing something I do not feel comfortable doing outside of intimate friendships, I chose to trust in my instructor’s purpose and to share in my essay the personal quandary of writing it. In facing this choice, I have learned that I am far more comfortable analyzing and responding on non-personal matters, and I look forward greatly to doing more of that in this class.